Yamaha HS8 or Focal shape 65. This is reality. You can absolutely achieve pro mixes if you know what you’re doing and have a good room. More! Focal SHAPE 50. WolfSound October 12, 2015, 9:42pm #13. Allot of pro's still use them here in sweden. These look very similar to the inverted dome tweeter that’s used in Focal’s CMS models and the Passport, and you’d be forgiven for thinking they were the same, but these are made from pure aluminium rather than the aluminium magnesium alloy used for the more expensive monitors. Tight and balanced, very punchy. It’s like a guitar; I don’t care if it looks pretty, I just want it to play killer. Recommendation on what to buy. It's a fact, doesn't matter what "the majority" is doing. I owned hs80, had a pair of csm65 too. In terms of price, the Shape range is positioned somewhere between Focal's budget-friendly Alpha series and the Solo6 Be – another 6.5" two-way monitor. Is not a bad thing to be in "minority". Focal-π Shaper is a telescopic optical systems that transforms Gaussian or similar Intensity distribution of TEM 00 laser beam to the beam with Airy disk distribution providing by focusing Flat-top, "inverse-Gauss", "Doughnut" and some other profiles of the focused spot; Sharp call, you don’t know what my room sounds like; because you haven’t heard it. Well, in that case I'm positive that you should pick the Focals, but make sure they have a nice return policy, so you can check them at your location and send them back if they don't work for whatever reason. Why? I do have bass traps in corners and really reflection points and a couple more sitting around the room. Getting in Shape. Flax Sandwich Cone Woofer: 5.0" As in the Billy Joel's song. I'm really in love with its sound. A studio monitor speaker for near-field monitoring must be as accurate and clean as possible, because the job listens to the audio reproduction directly in order to reduce the effects of the room acoustics. I especially like producing hip-hop, so the speakers need to be able to handle low end, without a sub, but also not over-exaggerate it. This model is composed of a 6.5” (16.5cm) woofer/ midrange speaker with a Polyglass cone loaded in a large laminar port associated to a 70W amplifier and of a 1" (25mm) aluminum inverted dome tweeter (35W amplifier). the music seems three-dimensional. With other interfaces it is not so spectacular. The Alpha 65, with its 6.5–inch bass driver, sits in the middle of the Alpha range, with the five–inch Alpha 50 (£398 a pair) and eight–inch Alpha 80 (£558 a pair) on either side. perfect combination. Are they really more popular that the Adam A7x? the music seems three-dimensional. First let me say, as I did back in my previous review, that the sound of the Shapes is quite different than that of Focal’s Be, SM, or Alpha Series monitors. Lik… One is bass and midrange, the other just bass. You just need good room and good knowledge and experience. How about most popular in this class Hedd 07? listen to many others .. with spl crimson it sounds really magical. If you don't want to spend allot i'd recommend genelec 1030, used around 6-800$. 12.28 in. alpha: (optional) Weighting factor in range (0,1) to balance: positive vs negative examples. the shape is with an audien id22 and the sound is not so open nor so transparent. However, both are very good options in their price range, assuming you were talking about the Focal Alpha 65 and Yamaha HS8. It's not a horrible interface either, but I'm a little disappointed. Adam A7X Vs Focal Alpha 65 Also, once you get to hear high-end monitors and understand what you're missing it's really hard to go back. There is more pro mixes being done with HS series than with any other speakers. The Shape series is their most recent design that delivers excellent fidelity at a … Thanks man. When I first set them up, they sounded good albeit stiff. Both the Alpha 50 and Alpha 80 have polyglass cone woofers and 1in (25mm) inverted dome tweeters. Those kinds of monitors live either in gigantic high-end pro studios or the hobby studios of rich people. perfect combination. the thing is easy. Lol. Focal Alpha 65 has good bass and midrange, but with less presence of treble. But yeah. However, both are very good options in their price range, assuming you were talking about the Focal Alpha 65 and Yamaha HS8. Focal positions the Alpha 50 monitors for music production, that is, more for individual creativity, where power is not so important. Focal Shape 65, Alpha 80, or Adam a7x? The mid range was not very clear and had a lot of background noise. I'm addicted to audio interfaces, for years, I've been looking for that interface that shines, that surrounds you, that seduces you. I don’t really think this is bora bora though. They are 2 different worlds. So you’re probably not qualified to tell me. For all genres eps. 10.12 in. alpha: optional alpha weighting factor to balance positives vs negatives. There's a thread in this section, "Not convinced on high-end studio monitors", and sure, many will say what you're saying, but the truth is you do get more if you're willing to pay more, hence you can offer more. Focal Alpha 50 Focal is one of the most respected brands in audio. If you have a chance, go to your usual store and talk to the boy. Equalization is remarkably easy to manage, thanks to the neutral balance between all registers. I have alpha with an analog interface spl. # Returns: softmax_focal_loss: Softmax focal loss, tensor of shape (?, num_boxes). """ These are exciting times! 2 Reviews. Shop now at Amazon. The Shape monitors replace Focal’s CMS models, placing them above the company’s budget-priced Alpha series (reviewed December 2014) and below the Solo6 Be, Twin6 Be, and Trio6 Be models. before having the alpha, I had a dynaudio bm15a. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. Focal. ... As info, these have replaced my Alpha 50s. The Focal Shape 50's have replaced a pair of Genelec 8030C's and are without a doubt the most detailed, natural sounding monitor I have used to date. I'm looking to buy my first pair of monitors. I changed my home, and unfortunately, it was a nightmare the change of study. Yep. AurusAudio. Uprading Monitors. 799 € 21 044,06 Kč ... Upgraded from Focal Alpha 80s which were probably too big for my room. I like them and find them very revealing (y), Cliche wording but Focals are more revealing especially in the lower mids. I wouldn't put too much money on speakers in that kind of a room. Audient drowns the sound of my 2 focal. Sorry for the delayed reply. Best seller. 1 Like. By and large, one can call both the Adam A7X and Focal Alpha 65 fairly portable, seeing as both speakers can be easily lifted by one person. I work/compose in a very competitive environment and without a doubt my … The Shape range comes in 40, 50 and 65 flavours, and it is the latter we are looking at here. 12.32 in. This is somply not true. Hadn’t come across them in my research, thanks for the suggestion! Focal Vs. Genelec. If you want cheap, yet reliable, and if you dig their sound -which I don't- I'm sure the Yammies are a safe bet. Focal Alpha 50 is a well-known option on the higher end of the price range. I have heard the Alphas and the Adam's speakers in the range you are looking at and even the higher end as well and the Klasik's are definitely a cut above those mentioned in almost every aspect... Well I didn't do frequency sweeps to compare they two in the shop. Focal Shape Twin. I have alpha with an analog interface spl. Music is about feelings, about our soul. Walls, corners, ceiling etc. It has good serious, they are good to mix. But, when put side by side, it’s clear to see that the Focal Alpha 65 is somewhat larger than Adam A7X. I have really appreciated these responses, they have been really helpful! The president of a nation is a really strong minority, yet he can put in motion millions of people through his decisions. It is quite likely that a pair of high-end monitors in a poor treated room to offer less than a pair of low-ends in a well treated one. in the dynaudio had a small ball of bass. Although the Yamaha hs series is a decent entry speaker there are far better ones for a couple of extra $. reflect waves, which will lead to. I know dozens of people who produce/engineer/mix/master for a living. 6.34 in. I must say, that the surprise was incredible. French manufacturer Focal has released many well-respected monitors for mixers mixers of all skill levels. geeorge audient for me, it's a nice company, but I could not say it's a high quality interface. Focal SHAPE 50. Maybe we can assume I’m somewhat aware of the lack of some basic info. They own $500 (well, more like $1000) speakers that they know extremely well. I think people can get too hung up on this to the point where they think getting the "wrong" kit will be a disaster. focal shape sound is more critical ,. the sound of alpha is overwhelming. This is because Adam A7X has a wider frequency range which allows the speaker to reach higher frequencies. The focals where very nice. monitors of 600 euros, sounds a thousand times better than a dynaudio of 2300euros. It depends... How far away can they be placed? Normally, you find all the interfaces quite similar. This is what we're talking about after all. Key Features. Focal Alpha 50 Shop now at Amazon. For me best monitors in this price range without a doubt. Adam is another sound. It does not have bass balls and it sounds like a lot of money monitor. All things considered I've heard surprisingly good mixes even on Yamaha HS7. so I recommend blindly, alpha with a crimson, as if it were a single product. I have gone 2 times for them, I have always surrendered to focal. It also weights more. I discovered ATCs 2 years ago, was thinking after...can't believe I wasted so many years without this in my life. absolute record. They are 2 different worlds. It's more round, more digital. Focal Alpha 50 vs Focal SHAPE 40. Who cares that you can buy a car with those kind of money, I believe you get more by investing in your soul. The alpha have colored lowend u can hear it immediately this tweeter its not as stiff as u need it to judge resonances. The treble of Adam A7X is much more accurate and detailed. It has a lot of definition, a lot of depth. for that reason, I insist on the interface topic. Jeff was spot on, actually. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. I figured whether I like they sound or not, that one might allow me to make more educated mixes. If i get this right what they told you in this class, headphones would be pretty slim in the bass department if you'd need half of the wavelength. the tweeter probably can't reach much below 2 or 3k, but can you expect an 8" to reach up that far with much accuracy? Yamaha HS8 or Focal 6.5. Focal’s latest launch, a trio of two-way nearfield active monitors in the form of the Shape 40, Shape 50 and Shape 65, is billed as a rethink of the company’s approach to nearfield studio monitors, with these new models being optimised for small-acoustic spaces such as those typically found in home, project and post-production studios. I know what I’m doing. It has a lot of definition, a lot of depth. More! Having established how both of these leading monitor speaker brands operate, let’s get into their products, specifically the Genelec 1237A and the Focal SM9. 12.32 in. Although we are moving up in price range, the Focal Alpha 50 is the cheapest studio monitor currently offered by Focal. The rest of us have no clue what your room sounds like, and are therefore not qualified to tell you what will work best for you. Entry level, but solid. You will not be able to create pro mixes, but you can get pretty close if you possess the skills and have a well treated room. As regards sub sonics and bass in general you'd rather need to consider the obverse. without hesitation alpha 80. They look very similar although with maybe an ever so slightly more refined tweeter. I'm sure there've been some higher end monitors that are 2 way with 8" woofers that sounded natural enough, but there are a lot of technical hurdles to overcome when you're trying to represent 20hz to 20khz with an 8" speaker and a 1" (or similar) tweeter. Both are powered speakers that have been designed for near-field monitoring. Shape 40 is the most compact studio monitor in the Focal Professional line, and the perfect solution for nearfield monitoring. Lol, Uprading Monitors. the alpha series is the most sold of all history in Europe. Of course people paying thousands for monitors are a minority, but this minority gets to do the high-end jobs, which are also paid accordingly. Wouldn't we all enjoy getting tickets to Bora-Bora instead of paying thousands and thousands of dollars on monitors if a pair of $500 speakers would solve the problem!? ... Focal Shape 50 - 5.0" Active 2-Way Studio Monitor (Single) B&H # FOSHAPE50 MFR # SHAPE 50. I have a colleague doing hi-end production with Yamaha HS8 and his productions sound better than 95% of people with more expensive speakers. I'm glad the information is useful. I guess I’m under the impression that some monitors work better in small and traditional shaped residential rooms which is where I often end up. Key Features. In my opinion they are exactly what you would be looking for! the sound of alpha is overwhelming. Only one way to tell - audition both in your room. These speakers are more pleasant to work on in comparison, they don't go as low so when it comes to the low end but honestly I've not missed it. Very few of them own speakers that cost car money. Alpha 80's were fantastic for almost every audio purpose. I needed something smaller. without hesitation alpha 80 I'm a music producer seeking to produce all genres of music. Tomorrow I am getting focal alpha 80 but i can’t get out of my head the yamahas Class A problems right? Neither two are "high end", hence don't expect many opinions. Big bands in the 1950's were having their stuff produced just fine on clunky Altec-Lansing monophonic dinosaurs. Focal. I have had my Klasik's in a small room (2.2x2.5m) placed about 60-90cm away from the wall and have had no coloration issues or any low end problems. 7.52 in. The power of the amplifiers is slightly lower comparing to the Shape Series. Room is 75%, experience 20% and speaker is 5% when it portrays at least 40Hz - 20kHz. The unique part of the design, and what makes it a 2.5-way system instead of a 3-way, is that one of the drivers handles frequencies from 40 Hz to 180 Hz and the other from 40 Hz to 2.5 kHz. While all of those model lines nail the detailed and critical Focal studio monitor sound, the Shape line has an evenness, and better yet a richness, not found in the other models. (800) 222-4700 Talk to an expert! When you buy products through links across our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. What’s it called when someone uses their mouth to say something that isn’t helpful? In addition, Adam A7X sounds quite brighter and crisper than Focal Alpha 65. Alpha equal to 1.0 indicates the fund has beaten the benchmark by 1%, so the higher the alpha, the better. More like, do you want to go to Galveston or Mexico. 8.66 in. More! I love these "pro mixes" comments. What’s it called when someone uses their mouth to say something that isn’t helpful? Thanks. Mega-Music October 12, 2015, 9:38pm #12. Like someone else mentioned before do yourself a favor and try aps klasik's before you decide to buy something. The Genelec's had nowhere near the tightness in the low end compared to the Shape 50's or the air on the top end. Low end is going to be terrible anyway..so you have to choose between a low end that's really skewed and not trust worthy or use smaller speaker without low end. Read Sweetwater customer reviews for Focal Shape 65 6.5 inch Powered Studio Monitor Reviews. Focal Alpha 50. focal shape sound is more critical,. For 2 years in a post production sound studio (heavily focused on foley), I used the Alpha 80's so I was familiar with Focal Alpha range sound. I also have the Shape 65. What have you tried? I do not have a good room. You work faster, you have more fun, you get less hearing fatigue, you're more accurate. Focal Alpha 50 is $106 more expensive than the average studio monitor ($192.99). You will not be able to create pro mixes, but you can get pretty close if you possess the skills and have a well treated room. What do you own? if the source is good (cd) listening is 3d you can feel the musicians in the house, in your face. People paying thousands just for monitors are in the minority. I realize i didn’t put focal shape … Sorry. It has good serious, they are good to mix. Focal Alpha 65has a 1” tweeter and a 6.5” woofer. focal alpha may not be perfect. The price range is quite different. And back to point 0 again. The brand's Alpha series is also a great solution for affordable monitoring with unmistakable quality. When you buy products through links across our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Focal Alpha 50. the diference is huge. MitchMunro Hi bro. Rated 4.5 / 5 by 21 customers! Take Yamaha then…If you can’t sattle down . This French company produces some of the most high-fidelity studio monitors in the game. I’ve mixed voice and tv/radio commercial work but not music on the genelecs in a good room. I've heard mixes reviews and they seem ok as an upgrade from my NHT M00's. What would you buy? inputs: A float tensor of arbitrary shape. They also translate extremely well! What to buy Adam a7x or focal alpha 80; If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. It's a compact sound, punch, I would not say it's bad, but it's not very exciting either. The professional Focal Alpha 50 monitor is the most compact representative from the line. targets: A float tensor with the same shape as inputs. Each room is different, each room sounds different, so at the end picking the right monitors is a personal choice. Then I left the studio and left those beautiful Alpha 80's. These monitors can be used from 23″ away (60cm), and they have astonishingly extended low end frequency response. The three models in the line are: The Shape 40 (4” woofer), Shape 50 (5” woofer) and Shape … For sure the HS 7&8 are a best bang for the buck type of monitor. Yamaha HS80m's or the new HS8 monitor. They were very big. Focal Alpha 80 Active 2-Way 8" Near Field Professional Monitoring Speaker (Single) B&H # FOALPHA80 MFR # FOPRO-ALPH80. I have the 2 focal models. 8.66 in. It’s not a dramatic jump from one price point to the other. Those are the best in their price range. Those were the words that could define the Alpha 80's. Hey folks. I realize what you’re saying. Bigger drivers tend to be a bit woofier, so you're likely to have more low end volume but less definition. Got 'em myself would never trade. The predictions for each example. Donald Trump: Thanks for the comparison of the two monitors, that is really helpful to hear your experience with them. Focal SHAPE 40 Shop now at Amazon. The Alpha 65 performs just as well with instrumental music as with electronic music, and is characterised by its great versatility. Firstly because unless you're mastering 5.1 dubs for Hollywood blockbusters, ten grand speakers will never pay for themselves, and secondly for most audio purposes $1000 monitors (and a producer who knows them well enough) is every bit as good as you'll ever need. Stores the binary: classification label for each element in inputs (0 for the negative class and 1 for the positive class). Detailed, crisp, deep, balanced. Relax, whatever your choice you will have a good set of monitors. I guess I’m under the impression that some monitors work better in small and traditional shaped residential rooms which is where I often end up. Consequently, if you’re looking for a compact sized speaker, Adam A7X would hit that preference despite its slight size difference compared to the Focal Alpha 65. Focal's Shape series are innovative nearfield monitors that provide mid-sized rooms with precise stereo image and acoustic transparency. I’ve always heard the genelecs were quite hyped and also wonder how they’d work in an unideal room. It's in the top 3 bestselling studio monitors and has dozens of popular alternatives in the same price range, such as Pioneer DJ Bulit5 or IK Multimedia iLoud Micro. But it is true. The Yamaha HS8 seem like a sensible way to go for a monitor that translates well. Right off the bat, the bass was tighter, cleaner and way easier to set in the mix. I proceeded to burn them in by running Itunes in the studio for 24 hours straight. Focal Shape 65 speakers are my most trustworthy monitors for playback and monitoring during any project I'm working on. You're also running a greater risk of weirdness in frequency response at the crossover point between those 2 drivers. focal alpha sounds everything in perfect harmony. I do understand that a ****ty mix is a ****ty mix. hip-hop and alt rock, APS - Audio Pro Solutions - Home | Facebook, http://www.hedd.audio/wp-content/dow...Sound-iXBT.pdf. I'd steer clear of 2 way monitor systems with an 8" woofer in general. According to Focal, this configuration gives the Shape Twin essentially the same woofer surface area as a standard 8-inch monitor, which accounts for its bass response going down to 40 Hz. The Focal SM9 is a range topping active three-way speaker which features the brand’s signature transducers. Apparently, Adam A7X and Focal CMS 65 are the studio monitor speaker models available in your price range. Once again, you can absolutely do hi-end production on Yamaha HS range as much as you can on any other more expensive speaker. They have great low end but not hyped in any way!